Sunday, October 25, 2015

Folk Tales


Folk tales 001

Folk tale (ESL 5301-001)

Following is a folk tale told by almost all moms/grandparents to their small kids/grandchildren while eating.  The following story has the moral that “One Should Think Well before Acting.”
                                                       The Crow and the Fox
                 
                  Once upon a time, a fox and a crow lived in a forest.  The crow, being small, took a piece of food from a neighboring house and was happily eating perching on a tree top.  A fox that passed through the way noticed the crow and immediately came up with a plan to trick the crow.  The fox slowly approached the tree and spoke to the crow: “My dear friend, the whole jungle was filled with unpleasant sounds without you and your sheer presence brings life to the jungle.  It would be great if you could sing a song with your sweet voice for other creatures in the forest”.  The crow, flattered by the fox's continuous compliments, opened its mouth to sing.  As soon as it opened its mouth, the entire food fell down and the fox happily ate all the food.  The crow looked at the fox helplessly and learnt an important lesson of life – “Think before you act”. (Sriramvignesh Mani)

The Pony across the River

                  Pony and his mother lived near a small river; he had a very happy lifetime with his mother. One day, his mother said to pony: “Pony, you have grown up, would you help me to carry this bag full of food to your aunt’s home which is located in a village right across the river?” “Certainly. I would be very glad,” said pony.
                  He was laden with food and came quickly to the small river. But there was no bridge over the river. He wanted to go across the river, but he didn’t know how deep the water was. When he was wondering, he saw a cow was eating not far away. Pony quickly ran to cow: "Dear uncle, do you know how deep the river is, or whether I could go across the river? The cow said smoothly with a smile, “don’t worry about it. The river is just to my leg."
                  Pony went back the river and tried to go through the river. At this time, he heard a voice saying, "Pony, pony don’t go! This river is so deep that it drowned my friend last week.” A small squirrel shouted, “Two days ago, one of my friends accidentally fell into the river; the river took him and swept him away."
                  Pony had no idea, how he could go across the river. He had to go back and ask his mother. He returned home and told his mother.  "Never mind, let's go and see," said his mother.
                  Pony and his mother came to the river again. “Try to cross the river by yourself,” Mother said. Pony ventured cautiously, step by step walking through the river. Oh, he knew, neither was it like the cow says, a river so shallow, nor like the squirrel says, so deep. It is most important to do things by oneself. “Thank you, mother." He was particularly happy today.
                  Through this story we know, if we want to understand the truth, the only way is to go and try by ourselves. (Songhe)

Arabian Nights

                  Arabian nights or as the literal translation of the Arabic name “one thousand and one nights” is one of the most famous and probably advanced collections of fiction stories in Arabic literature. The collection was published in a book with the same name, which was translated to many languages and became very famous worldwide.
                  The book tells the story of a king called Shahriar, who used to marry a new wife each day and kill her by dawn. Shahriar kept this habit for long time, until all the girls in the city were either killed or escaped to save their lives.
                  One day, one of the guards of Shahriar told him that the prime minister had a beautiful daughter whom he was hiding for long time, her name was Shahrzad. The king immediately called for his prime minister, and asked to marry his daughter. The prime minister was shocked, but couldn’t say a word other than, yes my lord; then he went home, and sadly told his daughter about the king's proposal, and asked her to escape, while he would stay and probably be killed. Shahrzad was a smart girl; she asked her father not to be worried and to proceed with the wedding arrangements. She simply had a plan; every night she would start a new fiction story to the king, and keep telling the story until dawn; then she would stop and promise to continue the next night; once a story was finished, she immediately would start a new one. The king was impressed by the stories, and was always eager to know how each one would end. Shahrzad kept doing this for a long, long time, until Shahriar forgot about his bad habit, and they lived happily ever after. (Muhammad A. Muhammad)

Folk Tale

                  This is a story  about  a  farmer  and  his  four  sons.
                  Once upon  a  time,  there  was  a  farmer  in  a  small  village  of  India.  He  had  huge  lands  on  which  he  used  to  cultivate  rice  and  wheat.  He  had  four  sons  who  always  used  to  keep  fighting  with  one  another  on  various  petty  issues.  He  used  to  get  sad  and  depressed  seeing  his  sons  arguing  all  the  time  with  each  other.  Overall,  it  was  not  a  happy,  united family  and  the  farmer  was  not  able  to  make  his  sons  realize  the  importance  of  togetherness  in  a  family. 
                  He was  around  75  years  old,  and  the  thought  of  his  sons  fighting  with  each  other  always  used  to  disturb  him.  One  day,  the  farmer  was  very  sick  and  with  each  passing  day,  his  health  started deteriorating.  The  sons  called  the  local  doctor  near  their  village  to  check  their  father  and  give  him  medicines.  The  doctor  made  it  very  clear  that  maybe,  these were the  last  few  days  of  the  farmer’s  life  and  that  he  wouldn’t  be  able  to  survive  for  a  long  time.  Once  the  farmer  got  to  know  this,  he  decided  to  make  the  property  papers  in  order  to  divide  all  his  property  and  money  between  his  four  sons.  But he  was  very  confused  about  the  ratio  in  which  his  property  should  be  divided.  He didn’t  know  if  he  should  divide  all  his  possessions  equally  amongst  his  four  sons  or  he  should  give  claim  of  his  property  in  accordance  with  the  age  of  his  sons. 
                  The sad part  was  that  even  when  the  farmer  was  on  death  bed,  the  four  sons  kept  fighting  with  each  other  on  the  issue  of  division  of  the  property.  The  farmer  made  a  resolution  that  before  dying,  he  would  sort  out  all  the  issues  between  the  four  brothers,  so  that  after  his  death,  they  wouldn’t  fight  with  each  other  anymore.  He  decided  to  teach  them  a  lesson  by  asking  them  to  do  a  small  activity.  He  asked  each  of  his  sons  to  bring  a  small,  thin  wood  stick  and  then  asked  each  one  of  them  to  break  their  wood  stick.  Everyone  was  successful  in  doing  what  their  father  told  them  to  do.  He  again  asked  each  of  his  four  sons  to  bring  a  small,  thin  wood  stick  but  this  time,  he  asked  them  to  tie  together  all  these  four  wood  sticks  in  and  make  a  bundle  of  them.  Once  his  sons  were  finished  following  his  instructions,  he  then  asked  them  to  break  this  bundle  of  wood  sticks.  This time none of his  son  was  able  to  break  the  bundle.  Seeing their sad  faces,  he  asked  all  of  them  to  come  and  sit  beside  him.  He  told  them that his four sons were like four wood sticks.  If they kept on fighting like  this, anyone might very easily break the bond of the family. But if the four of them didn’t argue  or  fight  with  each  other  over  small  issues  and  instead  tried  to  solve  them  by  talking patiently with each other, their family would get strengthened and no outsider  would be able to break their bond.
                  Our  families  are  also  like  small,  thin  wood  sticks.  If  we  keep  fighting  or  judging  each  other  over  several  issues,  we  won’t  be  able  to  maintain  a  healthy,  peaceful  living.  But,  if  we  sort  out  our  issues  and  problems  by  talking  openly  and  calmly  with  each  other,  we  would  live  a  happy  and  healthier  life  and  no  one  would  be  able  to  break  our  bond  in  our  worst  situations.
                  So, what did we learn from this story? We learnt that “unity is strength”. This story  makes us realize that we can conquer the greatest challenges in our lives if we have a  healthy, strong, united family to guard us all the time and help us whenever we need  them.  (Harnoor Kaur)

                                                                     Folk Tale
 
                  In ancient China, there was a man working on his farm one day. Suddenly, a fat rabbit rushed out quickly and crashed into a tree. The rabbit died immediately because it broke its neck. The farmer just witnessed the whole process, so he took the rabbit home for dinner. The rabbit was fresh and juicy; since the farmer was very poor, this dinner was best of the year he ever had. Watching the bones leaving on the plate, the man started to doubt himself, “Even though I work hard on the farm every day, what I get cannot satisfy me at all. Today I did nothing but watched the rabbit hitting the tree and died, but I got a wonderful dinner at the end. So why do I have to work?” Then an idea was coming to him. In the next day, he discarded all his plow tools and sat next to the tree to wait for the same thing to happen. He believed that another rabbit would die for the same reason in some days, and he did not want to miss it. Day by day, the farm was overgrown with grass, and the man could not even see any shadow of rabbit. His story became popular in his town, and parents would use this story to give their kids a lesson that people should always rely on their own hands but not luck. (Jieying)

The Story of Tich Chu
                  Once upon a time, in a small village in Vietnam, there was a little boy named Tich Chu. He was an orphaned child, living with his grandma. Grandma had to work very hard to raise him; she gave him all her love and thoughtful care. However, Tich Chu seemed not to love her; he spent all his time hanging out with his friends and never cared about Grandma.
                  One day, Grandma was so sick that she could not get up. Meanwhile, Tich Chu was not home, still busy playing with his friends. Grandma was very thirsty, and she started calling Tich Chu:
                  - Tich Chu, please give me a sip of water. I am very thirsty.
She called him one time, two times, and three times; but Tich Chu did not show up. Then, she turned into a bird and flew away. Just at that moment, Tich Chu came home looking for something to eat, and he saw everything that happened to Grandma. He ran after the bird and cried:
                  - No, Grandma, don’t fly away. Please stay with me!
                  - I am very thirsty; I have to find water – replied the bird; and she kept flying away.
                  Tich Chu kept running after the bird while crying bitterly. Finally, the bird landed next to a spring and started to drink water there. Tich Chu tried to approach the bird and insisted:
                  - Grandma, I’m sorry, I’m very sorry. Please come back with me. I will give you water, I will take care of you. Please don’t leave me alone.
                  - It’s too late, too late, Tich Chu. I cannot turn back to a human anymore. Cuckoo, cuckoo, koo…- said sadly the bird.
                  Tich Chu burst into crying desperately. He felt regret for having afflicted his Grandma before, and he did not know how to have her back with him. Suddenly, a beautiful fairy appeared and asked why he was crying. Tich Chu told everything to the fairy. Then, the fairy said:
                  - If you want your Grandma back to be a human, you should let her drink the water from a magical spring in a distant land. It is very far from here. I am not sure if you can do it.
                  - Yes, I can. I will do whatever to turn my Grandma back to a human – said determinedly Tich Chu.
                  The fairy gave him a pitcher and showed him how to get to the magic spring. After going over many mountains and rivers, finally, Tich Chu found the spring and filled his pitcher with its water. He came back and had the Grandma bird drank that water. The magic indeed worked; his Grandma was back to being a human. From that day on, Tich Chu always took good care of Grandma, and he never left her alone in sickness.  (Nam Giang Trinh)

                                                      The Rich Man and his Utensils
 

                 Once upon a time there was a rich man. He was very greedy and his house was full of costly utensils. Poor people in his town used to borrow his utensils whenever they had ceremonies in their home. The people had to return the utensil along with a hefty rent after the use. The greedy rich man suddenly increased the rent of his utensils and the people became very sad. One day a very strange thing happened. One man who borrowed the rich man’s utensils returned a couple of utensils more than those he borrowed. The rich man got perplexed and asked the man how come it was possible. The man replied that some of the utensils were pregnant while he took them home and they delivered baby utensils in his home. He also said it was his duty to return both parent and baby utensils back to the owner. The rich man couldn’t believe this story. He knew that it was not possible. However, because of his greedy nature, he thought it was ok to accept the extra vessels from the man. After several days the man again came back to borrow some of the very expensive utensils from the rich man. The rich man gladly gave him all the expensive utensils that he had, in the belief that he would get more utensils and money in return. The man took all the borrowed expensive utensils to his home. Several days passed and the man was not returning the expensive utensils. The rich man became restless and worried. One day he decided to meet the man who borrowed his expensive utensils and went to see him in his home. After some time the rich man reached the house of the other man and inquired of him why he was not returning the expensive utensils. The man replied that this time all the expensive utensils that he borrowed died in his home. So it was not possible for him to return them back. The rich man became silent and couldn’t say anything back to the other man. The moral of the story is, "greediness will make you lose everything.” (Sankar)

Genius Mahosod and the Cow Thief

     Once upon a time, there was a seven-year-old boy named Mahosod. He was very clever. He solved many hard problems easily. People in his town assigned him to be a judge. Whenever people had conflicts, they would go to see him and admit his justice. And his justice never let anyone down.
     This is a chapter in his very long story. A cow owner goes to take a shower in a big lake. He ties his cow with a tree and hopes it is safe. A bad guy walks past and then he takes. The owner on the lake sees everything the thief makes. (I try to make a poem)
     The owner runs to catch that bad guy, but he has to cry. The bad guy denies. “You can’t verify. There are no other eyes.” The bad one smiles. They begin to fight, until some people stop by. The people apologize; they can’t justify, but they know who can try. They take the two guys; they go to Mahosod’s help.
     Mahosod does it easily. The genius asks them simply, “What food you feed this cow?” The thief is so proud; he does take care of his cow. He fed it milk and grains. The true owner complains, he is so vain. I’m a poor man. I fed it with grasses.
     Mahosod smiles. He tells the guy to mix a medicine. If he feeds this kind, the cow will vomit. Then he feeds the medicine to the cow, and waits for some hours, the cow vomits it out.
     Its vomit is the grasses. Then Mahosod asks, which one is arch? The people don’t doubt that the one who’s false. The vomit is grasses, then it ate grasses. Then the man who said that he fed it with milk and grains is the thief. The owner receives, whose cow was thieved. And the thief runs away.
     People salute Mahosod again. The news of his intelligence comes to the King. Then what is the next thing? What’s happening? Please be waiting 'til the next chapter.   (Ariyawat)  


                                                      The Walker and his Animals

            A man, his horse and his dog walked by a rural road when suddenly lightning fell and killed all three immediately. The man did not notice that he had died and continued on his way with the horse and the dog.
            The road had a strong slope. The weather was very hot. It was very dusty also and they had walked a long distance. They were exhausted and thirsty.
            After a curve, the man saw a large beautifully decorated gate. He could see that the gate was the entrance to a huge garden with all kinds of trees and flowers. He saw that in the middle of the garden a huge pool offered fresh water to its visitors.
             The man walked in the direction of the guard that protected the gate. After greeting, the man asked him about the name of that beautiful and comfortable place. The guard said this is the heaven. The man, surprised, said: Oh!!.. Marvelous, we are in the heaven. We are thirsty!. The guard, pointing at the pool, said to the man: In this place, you can drink all water you want. Please, go ahead…but, only you can pass. The man said: My horse and my dog also want to drink water. They also are thirsty. I am sorry – said the guard - In this place the entrance of animals is not allowed.
            The man was angry because he was so thirsty, but he did not think of drinking water alone. He got up, said good bye to the guard and continued walking.
            The road had its huge slope yet and the sun heated up even more. They were really tired at that moment when they arrived to another place. This time the little gate was made of old wood. He could see that the gate led to a dusty road which finished in a puddle of water surrounded by several trees. Next to a tree, an old man was sitting on the ground; he probably was sleeping. The thirsty man and his animals entered and walked in direction of the old man. Good morning!, said the walker. The old man answered with a movement of his head. The man continued: We are thirsty: my dog, my horse and me, said the man. The old man responded: There is a little river next to those rocks. You and your animals can drink all the water you need. The walker and his animals went to the river and they gorged their thirst. After that, they came back to where the old man was sitting and thanked the man for the courtesy. The old man responded: You and your animals can come back when you like. After thanks again, the man said: What is the name of this place? The heaven, answered the old man. Really? But we just passed another place a few miles ago, and its guard told me that was the Heaven! Said the man, That is not the heaven, it is the hell. Said the old man, You should prohibit others from using your name. This information is false and can induct to errors! said the man. No way - rebuked the old man – they really do a favor to us, because in that place stay all those capable of abandoning their best friends. (Elliot)

Sunday, October 11, 2015

Survey accounts


ESL 5301 Survey stories

Survey related

                  Following the unanimous decision in the ESL 5301-001 class to collect surveys from people regarding gay marriages and their related issues on Texas Tech University campus, I set out on a journey to explore and map people’s responses to the series of questions posed by us, a group of ten students taking the ESL 5301-001 course.  The entire process of survey collection was quite interesting for the likes of me, who spends most of my time within the four walls.  With a hope of finishing the surveys, I went to student union building (SUB) on October 1st 2015, around 12:00 noon with a strong confidence that lot of students would be present to grab their lunch.  As expected, the entire SUB was buzzing with lots of activities and students.  To start with, I selected people present in the SUB randomly and requested that they fill out the questionnaire provided they feel comfortable doing this survey.  Though a few people requested clarifications in certain questions, most of the people filled the survey without any problem.  However, few people in my department felt that the questions are too personal and suggested rephrasing the queries in a nicer way.  It should also be pointed out that people who took the survey were extremely nice and polite in answering to me.  Also, with a huge number of people in the SUB, it was extremely easy to find the required number of females and males.  In general, the entire exercise of doing the survey helped me in tuning my skills to approach strangers and also made me realize the importance of speaking coherently to strangers.  (Sriramvignesh Mani)

Story of the collection of the survey

The assignment of collecting the survey for the English writing class was altogether a new experience for me. I never approached any person in my life for filling a survey. The task assigned to me was to get thirteen survey results from six American males, six American females and one from myself. In the beginning, I was bit confused about approaching random people for filling out the survey. At first, I approached my colleagues (six males and two female Americans) in the department of Geosciences. They were very happy to discuss gay marriage and gladly filled out the survey. After finishing the survey, we all started discussing gay marriage and its relevance in Texas. The discussion was really interesting. At the end it was very clear to me that most of the young liberals support gay marriage.  In order to make the survey more reasonable, I went to the student union and approached random unknown female students. I briefly explained to them about the writing class that I am enrolled in and the survey that they can help me with. All of the girls very happily listened to me and agreed to undertake the survey. At the end I was very happy, and  finished completing all the tasks that were assigned to me by the class. (Sankar)

Story of the survey

                  I did my survey on September 30, 2015 in a church group, as I take part in bible study every Wednesday. I was lucky to find out that there were six American males and six females on that day, which just fitted the sample amount I needed to finish. All of them were happy to help me answer the questions. I realized that people felt uncomfortable if I was present next to them; they would discuss it with their friends but would hide their answers from me. At the very first beginning I thought they would answer the questions very quickly, because I just took no more than two minutes to finish it. However, they took more than 15 minutes to think and discuss it with each other, which was out of my expectation. It seemed that Americans were actually very cautious about the gay marriage issue. Since most of them were Christian, I could tell they were struggling to answer the survey, and most of them disagreed with gay marriage, especially those who were older. Overall, this was a great chance for me to study Christians’ acceptance to gay marriage, and I learned that Christians were more conservative than other people. (Jieying Wu)

Survey Process

                  It was relatively easy to obtain the surveys. I decided to ask people located in the Student Union Building. I chose the after lunch time because at that moment it is easier to find the students relaxed. Before starting, I planned to interview student groups instead of asking discreetly. I decided to do this because I thought that it could be faster to complete the surveys: it is more practical to explain the survey to a group than individually. I mostly interviewed students, although I also asked to three employees of the Texas Tech Housing Department. The strategy of group interviews was initially perfect in terms of the time devoted because I could receive several surveys in one shot. I only needed to ask four groups to complete the twelve surveys. However, one of the sheets was not completely filled out. I made this mistake because I did not take enough time to review how each sheet was filled out. This was a defect of my plan that I did not think of. I needed to come back to the Student Union Building and to search for one more person to ask. Finally, I got two surveys more, reaching thirteen surveys, and found more one not completely filled out. (Elliot)

Experiences  while  collecting  Surveys

Since I’m a graduate student in the Chemical Engineering department, I mostly asked the people from my department to fill out the surveys. I asked some of my American colleagues, faculty and  staff members and also the undergraduate students in my teaching assistant (TA) laboratory to fill  the survey. Almost all of the graduate and undergraduate students as well as faculty members  filled out  the  survey  with  a  keen  interest  in  this  topic.  Most of the  staff  members  showed  no  inhibitions  while  answering  the  questions;  they  were  in  fact  very  interested  in  discussing  more about this issue with me and asked my opinions  regarding it. However, one of the staff  members  was  not  very  comfortable  in  filling  it out and  he  simply  said  that  he  doesn’t  support  this  agenda  of  gay  marriage  at  all.  Initially, he assumed that this survey was  a  part  of  some  national  survey  to  be  filled  by  all  the  Americans  and  so he  was  not  ready  to  answer  the  questions.  But once his colleagues told him  that  it’s  just  for  a  graduate  class,  he  filled  the  survey  shedding  some  inhibitions. The undergraduate students were the ones who  showed  a  lot  of  curiosity  in  this  topic  and  spent  a  considerable  amount  of  time  while  filling out  this  survey.  They, in fact, discussed this  issue  with  their  friends  even  after  their  experiments  in  the  laboratory  were  finished.  I felt that women were  more  comfortable  in  answering  the  questions  than  men  and  were  even  interested  in  knowing  the  final  results  of  our  survey.  I think it  would  be  really  interesting  to  see  the  outcome  of  this  survey  as  it  may  or  may  not  give  us  very  surprising  opinion  about  the  people  in  the  Texas  Tech  campus.  (Harnoor)

How I collected the surveys

I had all my surveys done in Holden Hall building in two days. I started my data collection easily with two male undergraduates; these young men were hanging out in the basement and were pleased to help me out with the survey. The next three ones, who, I guessed, were also undergraduates, did not give me such a warm welcome; they just tried to jot down their answers as quickly as they could without smiling or talking. Then, I came into the TA room of the History Department, asking someone there to take the surveys. A female graduate told me that she had never been concerned about gay marriage before. After finishing with the students, I tried to approach some older people in their offices; and I had the most interesting story with an office woman. She wrote and erased her words several times, struggling with the twelfth question and the last one. She even asked me who the instructor of my writing class was; she wondered if it was one of the gender studies professors in the History Department (Are you a gender studies professor, Mr. Leverett? J). I did not totally understand why she had such an inquiry, but I did know that she was not comfortable in answering our survey.  (Nam Giang Trinh)

Survey Story

Last Sunday, it was the Mid-Autumn Festival in China. It means there would have a big reunion party with the whole family in China. I was homesick every day, especially on this day. The Lubbock Chinese Association held a celebration dinner for the Mid-Autumn Festival at the China Star Restaurant. The dinner started at 6 pm and many Americans were invited. I brought my survey of gay marriage to the dinner, I thought it would be a good chance and relaxing time to do the survey. I sat in the table with two American girls, and began my survey. They were very glad to do the survey, and they were very interested in talking about gay marriage and they found four of their friends to do the survey, so It was very easy to finish half of the surveys. After that, I switched to other tables and continued doing my survey. All the people were very nice and glad to do the survey. I thought it was a correct choice to take the survey to the party. (Songhe)

Survey Story

After I had a lunch on Thursday September 24, I was in the Student Union Building. I went to the ballroom, because I thought many people would rest there. I chose the people who weren’t doing their work, so I chose people who were eating or people who were playing on their phones because I think they were free and wouldn’t reject my asking them favors. My strategy was that I went to a person and asked whether he/she was an American, and if the answer was yes, I asked him/her to do a survey.  Everything went very well as I thought; it was very easy to do my surveys. I finished twelve sheets of survey within an hour. Some women also asked me general personal questions such as my major, or my country, but no one asked for my name, nor did I ask theirs. (Ariyawat)




Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Survey


ESL 5301-001                     
Gay Marriage & Issues  Survey – answer them as you wish.

Thank you for filling out our survey!

1. ___ Male             ___ Female

2. Age:    ___ <20    ___ 20-29     ___ 30-39    ___ 40-49    ___ 50-59    ___ 60-69    ___70 & older

3. Where are you from?
___ Texas                ___ USA, not Texas             ___ international

4. How do you identify yourself politically?
___ Republican      ___ Democrat     ___ other (specify)     ___ independent

5. Do you consider yourself religious?
___ Yes, very           ___ Yes, slightly                 ___ No       ___ dislike religion           ___ other: explain

6. Do you have family members who are gay?
___ Yes                     ___ No

7. Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision legalizing gay marriage? 5 = strongly agree, 1 = strongly disagree

1               2               3               4               5

8. Did you change your mind on the issue of gay marriage over the past few years? If so, what changed your mind?


9. How do you think the decision will affect the lives of LGBT people? Check the ones you feel are true.
___ they will be healthier and have less stress
___ they will be happier
___ they will be less likely to hide their status
___ they will be more likely to participate in civic and religious activities

10. Do you agree that gay couples should be able to adopt children? 5 = strongly agree,
1 = strongly disagree

1               2               3               4               5

11. What matters most when finding an adoptive home for a child or children? Put 1 as most important, 2, 3, & 4, least important
___ income, financial security                                          ___ having two parents that love each other
___ parental love for children                                          ___ having appropriate gender role models

12. Do you think children raised in a gay family are more likely to be gay than other children?
___ Yes    ___ Yes slightly     ___ No difference     ___ Less likely

13. Do you think gay couples are more stable or less stable than heterosexual couples?
___ More stable                    ___ No difference     ___ Less stable      ____ don’t know

14. How will it affect children to be raised by gay parents? What difference is there, if any?



15. Do you support Kim Davis’ refusal to issue marriage licenses to gay couples?
___ Yes (she should follow her conscience)                             
___ No (she should do her job)
___ No opinion/other opinion

16. Do you feel that the bakers had a right to refuse to bake a cake for gay couples?
___ Yes, they have religious freedom to refuse to do that
___ No, they should not be allowed to discriminate in who they serve
___ other (specify)

17. Which of the following, if any, do you feel have the right to refuse to serve gays? (check as many as you wish, or none)
___ pastors who don’t want to officiate a wedding
___ doctors/emergency responders
___ bakers who feel that their cakes are expression of their art
___ artists who don’t want to create a picture for a gay wedding
___ religious adoption agency which doesn’t want to place children in gay families


Saturday, September 26, 2015

Data Commentary II - Same-sex marriage

ESL 5301-001 Gay Marriage
Data Commentary II

1. Data Commentary-2

The recent poll conducted by The Huffington Post concluded that the majority of Americans believe that the Kentucky clerk, Kim Davis, should go to jail for contempt of the Supreme Court order. According to the results, the majority think that she should issue a marriage license and obey the court order. The poll also suggests that she should consider resigning the job, if she is uncomfortable in issuing the marriage license to same sex couples. The data show that 52% of the respondents believe that government officials should perform the tasks without any kind of religious bias, while 30% of the respondents disagreed with the same concept. It is interesting to note that the political beliefs of the respondents have highly influenced their opinion on the polls. The data show that 70% the Democrats, 50% of the Independents and 40% of the Republicans supported the idea that Ms. Davis should issue the marriage license. The second question being asked was whether Ms. Davis should face the jail time and the percentage of people who supported that were 72% for the Democrats, 50% for the Independents and 42% for the Republicans. The third question for the poll was whether Ms. Davis should resign from her job, and the percentages of people who supported that idea were 75% for the Democrats, 60% for the Independents and 60% for the Republicans. The article also briefly describes how the religious beliefs of the people affect their opinion based on HuffPost/YouGov poll data. The data suggested that 81% of Republicans and 76% of evangelical Christians believed that the religious liberty was being threatened. The data also suggested that 43% of the Republicans who are born-again Christians think Ms. Davis should be allowed to stay in her job but should be allowed her choice to not issue marriage licenses to the same sex couples. However, 60% of total Republicans wanted her to resign the job. (Sankar)

Levy, A.E. (2015, September 9). Most Americans Support Sending Kim Davis To Jail, Poll Shows. The Huffington Post. Retrieved on September 17, 2015 from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/kim-davis-poll_55f04a65e4b002d5c0776f39

 2. Data Commentary - 2

An article in Gallup.com dated May 19th 2015 discusses clearly the outcome of a poll conducted among a thousand twenty four Americans aged eighteen and above to calculate the percentage of American population accepting same-sex marriages as legal. From the poll outcomes, it can easily be deduced that the percentage of Americans supporting the same-sex marriage increased from 27% in 1996 to 60% in 2015. It should be noted from the survey results that the support for same-sex marriage crossed above 50% in 2011 for the first time in the history of the United States. In addition to the general view among the American population, the poll results highlight that the Democrats provide major support for legalizing same-sex marriage while Republicans show the least support. Independent candidates typically provide more support than the Republicans. The article attributes the observed difference in the opinion between the Democrats and Republicans to the age-group of people comprising these parties. It also states that the majority of the younger American generation lean towards Democrats whereas most of the older generation support Republicans. Finally, it can be summarized that the support for homosexual marriages increased among the American population. Also, a majority of the young American generation who are Democrats support same-sex marriages while the older generation opposes it. (Sriramvignesh)

Reference

McCarthy, J. (2015, May 19th). Record-High 60% of Americans Support Same-Sex Marriage. Gallup.com. Retrieved on September 18, 2015 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/183272/record-high-americans-support-sex-marriage.aspx

3. Percentage of Americans who favor same-sex marriage by political party


PEW Research Center has conducted a research to study percentage of Americans who favor same-sex marriage by political party during the period between the years 2003 and 2015. The results were published in the Business Insider website. The research has compared between levels of support to same-sex marriage among Democrats, Republicans, and Independents.

According to the outcomes, there is clearly a growing support trend to same-sex marriage across the covered period, among all participants, regardless of their political views.

The outcomes also show that the highest support has been mostly coming from Democrats, slightly followed by Independents, and then come the Republicans with relatively lower levels of support.

Support levels starts at 42% among the Democrats, 40% among the Independents, and 22% among the Republicans during 2003, and continued to grow throughout the research covered period to reach 64% among both Democrats and Independents, and 35% among Republicans in 2015.

A possible explanation to the growing support trend is the influence of the media, and the way same-sex related issues are covered in the news and even in drama.

Regarding the relatively lower support levels for same-sex marriage among Republicans, a possible reason would be the relatively conservative culture of the Republican Party, which is widely considered as a more religion-friendly party. (Muhammad)

Survey | Percentage of Americans who favor same-sex marriage by political party (PEW Research Center)
http://www.businessinsider.com/r-over-60-percent-of-republicans-oppose-court-on-gay-marriage-reuters/ipsos-poll-2015-7

4. Data Commentary-2

According to a recent Washington Post- ABC News Poll, a majority of people said that Kim Davis should issue marriage licenses to gay couples even if she has strong religious beliefs. The survey found out that most of the people supported the idea of being treated equally under the law regardless of someone’s religion. This survey was conducted from September 7 to 10 among 1,003 random adults, which included people who responded on landline and cellphone and is considered to have a sampling error of plus or minus 3.5%. The pie chart in the survey shows that 63% of the people feel that the county clerk should be required to issue marriage licenses to gay couples regardless of her religious backgrounds, whereas 33% do not agree with this idea. The second graph in the survey showed the Democrats’, Republicans’ and Independents’ viewpoint in regards to treating people equally. Nearly 80% of Democrats said that people should be treated equally while this percentage in case of Independents was found out to be 75% and 66% for Republicans. Nearly half, about 49% of the conservatives said that Ms. Davis should not be compelled to violate her religious beliefs while 45% of the conservatives said she should be required to perform her duties. It could be seen that even though many of the conservatives are in favor of Ms. Davis’s idea of not issuing marriage licenses to gay couples, still the majority of the population feels that she should issue marriage licenses regardless of her religious grounds. We expect to have a similar result while we survey the students and faculty members in Texas Tech. (Harnoor)

Reference-

Somashekhar, S. & Craighill, M.,P. (2015, September 15). Post ABC poll: Most say Kim Davis should issue marriage licenses to gay couples. The Washington Post. Retrieved on September 17, 2015 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/poll-most-say-kim-davis-should-issue-marriage-licenses-to-gay-couples/2015/09/14/684e6d62-5b0a-11e5-b38e-06883aacba64_story.html

5. Data Commentary 02


The survey named “May 8-11 Values and Belief” conducted by Gallup has revealed the increasingly positive views of most Americans on gay adoption. According to the graph included in the survey that shows how American people since 1992 have replied to question, “Do you think same-sex couples should or should not have the legal right to adopt a child?”, the percentage of “Yes” answers has considerably increased over two past decades from 29% (1992) to 63% (2014); whereas, the opposing rate at the same time has declined from 63% (1992) to 35% (2014). There was only a little different development in 2007 with the reverse tendency: increasing opponents (from 48% to 50%) and decreasing supporters (from 49% to 46%). Another figure resulted from the survey and titled “Same-sex Couples and Adoption, by Age”, confirmed that so far as in 2014, the majority of all four age groups are proponents for same-sex couples’ right to adopt children. With 77% of people at the age of 18-29 and 52% for 65-and-over-year-olds saying homosexual couples should have the legal right to adopt a child, this table also shows that the younger people’s ages are, the more likely they favor gay adoption. In sum, gay adoption has gained more support from American people, especially the young. Legalizing this adoption right nationwide may be the follow-up goal for same-sex couples after getting their marriage licenses. (Nam)

Reference:

Swift, A. (May 30, 2014). Most Americans say same-sex couples entitled to adopt. Gallup. Retrieved on September 17, 2015 from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/170801/americans-say-sex-couples-entitled-adopt.aspx

6. Commentary 2

From the gay marriage survey, I am very interested in the difference among different political parties. The Washington Post-ABC News polls made a survey from 2004 to 2013 year to investigate how the political parties’ attitude to gay couples changed in recent years. The sampling number was 1,001 and they were divided into three groups: Democrats, Independents, and Republicans. The result plot began at 2004 and ended at 2013. From the observation we can easily tell that support towards gay marriage legalization increased in the recent decade, and the opposite voice tends to decrease accordingly. Generally, the trends from different political parties are very similar to each other. However, the difference from the data it still obvious. Democrats’ support for gay marriage raised from 46% to 72%, and the opponents dropped from 50% to 23%. At the same time, the supporters of Independents raised by 15%, while its opponents dropped by 17%. Republicans’ views to this issue seemed to be comparably stable; the percentage of opponents in 2004 year is 72% and in 2013 percentage just changes to 59%; both of the numbers are the highest among the three groups. Similarly, its number of supporters are the lowest at the very beginning, which changed from 24% to 34%. From these plots we can see that Republicans are still the most conservative for legalizing gay marriage. On the contrary, Democrats are the most hospitable parties to this issue, and Independents share a similar trend with it. For the upcoming survey we will make next week, this report inspires me a lot for understanding the political difference related to the same-sex marriage issue and I am very much looking forward to seeing how Texas Tech students will respond to this question. (Jieying)

Reference:

New poll proves national majority support same-sex marriage. (2013, March 20). Equally Wed. Retrieved in September 17, 2015 from:
http://equallywed.com/new-poll-proves-national-majority-support-same-sex-marriage/

7. Survey Analysis

The PEW research Center made a study in June of 2015 with the aim of sensing the growth in the support for same-sex marriage. The research center based its study in surveys made between years 2005 and the year 2015. The surveys consigned four generation of people: Millennials, people who were born after 10980; Gen X, born between 1965 and 1980; Baby boom, born between 1946 and 1964 and Silent, who were born between 1928 and 1945. The last of the surveys made conducted among 2002 adults in all the States of the country.

The results show an important growth in the support of same-sex marriage. The support is led in all the period by Millennials, followed by Generation X. The survey also analyzed the support in terms of educational level. Students are mostly in favor and the more. This tendency is clearer in College and post-graduate students. The minor difference between favor and oppose can be seen at High school level. In terms of religious affiliation, the support for same-sex marriage is led by unaffiliated. White mainline Protestants and Catholics affiliates support mostly same-sex marriage. (Elliot)

PRC (2015, June 8). Support for Same-Sex Marriage at Record High, but Key Segments Remain Opposed. Pew Research Center. Retrieved on September 17, 2015 from http://www.people-press.org/2015/06/08/section-1-changing-views-of-same-sex-marriage/

8. Data Commentary #2

The support for gays and lesbians is becoming social and has been growing in various ways during the last ten years. During these years those who oppose are from 58% falling to 44%, and those who favor are from 33% increasing to 49%.

These are some differences during the different age period. Millennial, Gen X, Baby boom and Silent are increasing during 2003 to 2013. In this graph, we can see Millennial’s support is from 51% increasing to 70% during the past decade; gay marriage gained more support among Millennials than others, because Millennials are younger and more open to accept the gay marriage than the older people in the U.S.A.

According this graph, we can see the rising support for gay marriage over the past decade. The article, “Growing Support for Gay Marriage: Changed Minds and Changing Demographics” shows that a increasing support from young adults – the Millennial generation – who are far more open to gay rights than previous generations. And it will continue increasing further. (Songhe)

Reference:

Pew Research Center. (2013. Mar,20). Growing Support for Gay Marriage: Changed Minds and Changing Demographics. Retrieved on Mar.20, 2013 from: http://www.people-press.org/2013/03/20/growing-support-for-gay-marriage-changed-minds-and-changing-demographics/
 

9. Data Commentary

According to a survey about whether female homosexual couples should be allowed to adopt a baby, graphs show the percentage supporting attitudes from four religion groups of people: Anglicans, Catholics, other Christians and No religion, in the period from 1985 to 2007. Every graph has the same pattern; it starts with a low percentage (10 - 20) and keeps going down until 1987, and rises up until around 1990, and goes down a little and keeps straightforwardly rising up from 1993 to the end of survey (2007).

The final inclinations of every graph have an interesting thing; although the no religion has the highest percentage ( > 50%) of support, the Catholics' graph has the highest inclination, which means that the Catholics now trend to change their mind toward allowing lesbian’s adoption significantly. The trend of the graph shows that the Catholics will come to have the highest support of allowing lesbian’s adoption in 12 years. For the first trend of the graphs, every group is going down; I assume that is the booming of religion, but after 1987, every graph is going up, but they stop increasing in 1990 and go down again, which means some religion attempt but after 1993 the graphs don't have their ways to stop which I notice the change in people believe. (Ariyawat)

Clements, B. (2011, August 8). Attitudes towards Gay Rights. British Religion in Numbers. Retrieved on September 17, 2015 from
http://www.brin.ac.uk/figures/attitudes-towards-gay-rights/

Monday, September 21, 2015

Data commentary I - Gay marriage issues

ESL 5301 – 001 Gay Marriage
Data Commentary I
 

1. Views on Selected Gay and Lesbian Issues by Age
 

The graph shows the results of a survey about differences in acceptance rates to gay and lesbian issues between different age groups. The survey was run in July, 2011 by Public Religion Research Institute, and the sample size was 3000 subjects.  

The results of the survey clearly show a generation gap when it comes to acceptance rates to gay and lesbian issues.
 

It is obvious that the older generation (age 65+) has lower acceptance rates compared to the other two age groups included in the survey. The gap reaches 33% when it comes to allowing gay and lesbian couples to adopt children.  

Acceptance rates go higher and the generation gap gets smaller with issues away from marriage and adoption, like permission to form civil unions, or supporting laws that would protect against job discrimination. 

One possible reason for the higher gap and relatively low acceptance rate to issues related to marriage and adoption is it could be based on religious references.  

Another possible explanation for the fact that acceptance rates among millennials are generally higher than among the two older age groups is the influence from the media, which have contributed to making gay and lesbian issues more acceptable in the society. (Muhammad)
 

Survey | Generations at Odds: The Millennial Generation and the Future of Gay and Lesbian Rights (Public Religion Research Institute)
http://publicreligion.org/research/2011/08/generations-at-odds/#.VfkWhBFVhBc
 

2. Data Commentary
 

Public Religion Research Institute in July 2011 conducted a survey among three thousand people in different age groups (general public, millennials (18-29) and seniors (65+)) regarding their views on various gay and lesbian related issues such as rights of same-sex couples to marry legally, rights of homosexuals to adopt children, same-sex couple privileges to form civil unions and prevention of job discrimination against homosexuals. Interestingly, it can be clearly seen from the outcome that for any of the above mentioned issues, the highest and lowest supports were from millennials and seniors respectively, with the general public falling in between them. Also, among the various issues, laws for preventing job discrimination garnered strong support among people in each age group compared to the other issues, though the exact quantitative numbers are unimportant for the current discussion. Finally, based on the above brief summary it can be concluded that younger generations are more open towards gay and lesbian related issues compared to the older people. (Sriramvignesh)
 

Reference
 

Survey - Generations at Odds: The Millennial Generation and the Future of Gay and Lesbian Rights. (2011, August 29th). Public Religion Research Institute. Retrieved on September 16, 2015 from http://publicreligion.org/research/2011/08/generations-at-odds/#.VfkCwRFVhBd
 

3. Graph Description 01
 

According to Pew Research Center, during the period 2003-2013, American adults of various generations have increasingly been in favor of same-sex marriage. Annual surveys conducted in the past decade found that a considerable number of Americans shifted their viewpoint from opposing to supporting gay marriage. Consequently, the percentage of opponents dropped from 58% (2003) to 44% (2013) while the supporters at the same time kept their proportion, which increased constantly from 33% to 49%. The surveys also showed that overall, same-sex marriage has gained more support from all generations of Americans over the past decade. However, the highest percentage of proponents and the most dramatically increasing support for gay marriage (51% in 2003 and 70% in 2013) belongs to the “Millennials” who were born after 1980. It seems obvious to us that the young American adults are much more open to same-sex marriage than the older generations. This, of course, in the near future, will decisively make the legal union of same-sex couples easily acceptable to the whole society. (Nam)
 

Reference:
 

PewResearchCenter (2013, March 20). Growing support for gay marriage: Changed minds and changing demographics. Retrieved on September 15, 2015 from: http://www.people-press.org/2013/03/20/growing-support-for-gay-marriage-changed-minds-and-changing-demographics/
 

4. Data Commentary-1
 

The graph pattern shows the change in trend of the opinion of Americans about same-sex marriage from 2003 to 2013. From the graph pattern it is very clear that, in the year 2003 there were 58% of the Americans opposing the concept of same sex marriage and only 33% were supporting the concept. Thereafter, there was a steady change in the trend of opinion throughout the time of the study. Exceptions include the year 2004 and 2009; there was an increase in the number of people compared to the previous year; who were opposing the same sex marriage compared to that of the people who were supporting it. In the year 2011, the graphs crossed each other. That means the number of people who were supporting it outgrew the number of people who were opposing it. In the year 2013 the percentage of people who were supporting same sex marriage was 49% and the percentage of people opposing same sex marriage was 44%. This dramatic change in opinion of same-sex marriage over a short span of tem years could be due to generational change. In the year 2003 the number of millennial generation (born after 1990) supporting same sex marriage was 51%. Similarly the 41% for Gen X (1965-1980), 33% for the baby boom (1946-1964) and 17% for the silent (1928-1945) generation were supporting it. In the year 2013 numbers changed drastically. That is, 70% of the millennial generation were supporting the same sex marriage. Similarly the percentage of the various generations who were supporting it were 49% for Gen X , 38% for the baby boom and 31% for the silent generation. So there is an overall increase in trend among all kinds of generations of Americans who were supporting the same sex marriage from 2003 to 2013. However the percentage of millennial generations who were supporting same sex marriage was much more compared to that of the other generational types. So the study shows that the supportive nature of the millennial generations over same sex marriage affected the overall opinion of Americans. (Sankar)
 

Pew Research Center. (2013, March 20). Growing support for gay marriage: Changed minds and changing demographics. Retrieved on September 15, 2015 from
http://www.people-press.org/2013/03/20/growing-support-for-gay-marriage-changed-minds-and-changing-demographics/


5. Data Commentary #1

 

According to the ‘Millennial, Religion and Gay and Lesbian Issues Survey’ investigated by Public Religion Research Institute in July 2011, we can tell the societal acceptance of same-sex marriage is changing over the years. The survey has 3,000 respondents, which are divided into three groups: general public, millennials (age 18-29), and seniors (age over 65). Four questions are posted within the survey, which included people’s acceptance towards gay marriage legalization, children adoption, civil unions’ formation, and rights protection from job discrimination for homosexual couples. The result shows that 140 people support gay marriage legalization; 158 people support children adoption; 184 people support civil unions’ formation; and 208 people support rights protection of job discrimination. In other words, for most people, they are more tending to agree with gay couples who fight against job discrimination rather than allowing them marry legally. To each question, the number of millennials is the highest, while the number of seniors is lowest. From this survey we can learn that most people support gay couples’ sharing the same right as others in their workplace. However, they cannot accept homosexual marriage legalization comparatively. Moreover, the plots imply that different generations have different opinions to this issue, in which young people are more hospitable to LGBTs while old people are hard to accept this fact. (Jieying)

Reference:
 

Jones, R.P. (2011, July). Millennial, Religion and Gay and Lesbian Issues Survey. Republic Religion Research Institute. Retrieved September 15, 2015, from:
http://publicreligion.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/PRRI-Views-on-Selected-Gay-Lesbian-Issues-by-age-.jpg
 

6. Data Commentary #1
 

The argument about gay and lesbian marriage is important and famous in the world. The graph, “views on selected gay and lesbian issues by age” points out the different attitudes of people of different ages. Comparing the different age ranges, including the general public, and comparing millennials and seniors, millennial people have more positive attitudes on marrying legally, adopting children, forming civil unions and protecting gay and lesbian people against job discrimination. However, the seniors have more negative attitudes in these fields. Among the gay and lesbian issues, all the age periods support protecting them against job discrimination.
 

According to this graph, we can see the right is the important part in social life, also including gays and lesbians. The article, “Julianne Moore And Ellen Page Fight For Gay Rights — Toronto Film Festival” shows that that is the kind of social issue that has been specialized in and regularly put a human face on. (Songhe)
 

Reference:
 

Hammond, P. (2015. Sep. 14). Julianne Moore And Ellen Page Fight For Gay Rights — Toronto Film Festival. Retrieved on Sep.14, 2015 from: http://deadline.com/2015/09/julianne-moore-ellen-page-gay-rights-toronto-1201525580/

7. Survey Analysis
 

The Public Religion Research Institute made a survey in July of 2011. The purpose was to learn the view of the population in relation to selected gay and lesbian issues. In the study a universe of three thousand people were surveyed and the respondents were classified into three groups: the General public, Millennials, who are between 18 and 29, and Seniors, who are 65 years or older. The responders were asked about four general questions: Allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry legally; allowing gay and lesbian couples to adopt children; allowing gay and lesbian couples to form civil unions; and Laws that would protect gay and lesbian people against job discrimination. The answers were classified in terms of the percent of people who approved each of four questions.
 

The results of the survey obtained for the Institute evidenced that Millennials was the group that offered a more receptive attitude in relation to lesbian and gay issues. General Public followed this behavior and Senior was the group who was approached and was more unreceptive to the four gay and lesbian issues. In relations to the questions, the matter related to laws to protect against job discrimination was the topic better received by the respondents. On the other hand, the worst reception showed for the respondents was related to allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry legally. The children’s adoption occupied the second place and the forming of civil union occupied the third place in terms of positive reception. (Elliot)
 

Jones, R., Cox, D. and Cook, E. (2011, August 29). Generations at Odds, the Millennial Generation and the Future of Gay and Lesbian Rights. Public Religion Research Institute. Retrieved on September 15, 2015 from http://publicreligion.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/PRRI-Report-on-Millennials-Religion-Gay-and-Lesbian-Issues-Survey.pdf
 

8. Data Commentary- 1
 

According to a survey by Pew Research Center, there has been a growing support for gay marriages over the past 10 years. The first figure in the survey shows that from the year 2003 to 2013, the percentage of adults opposing gay marriage has decreased from 58% to 49%, whereas the percentage of adults favoring gay marriage has increased from 33% to 44%. The second figure illustrates the percentage of each generation favoring gay marriage from year the 2003 to 2013. It has been shown that for each generation, the number of people supporting gay marriage has increased. The survey finds that 70% of Millenials, born after 1980, favor gay marriage and this percentage has considerably increased from 51% in 2003. Support for gay marriage has increased not only among young people but also among older generations. For example, the percentage of Silent generation in favor of gay marriage has increased from 17% in 2003 to 31% in 2013. There has only been a slight increase in the number of middle-aged generations supporting gay marriage. For example, 49% of Gen X generation supported gay marriage in 2013 whereas 41% of Gen X was in its favor in 2003. Similarly, the percentage of Baby Boom generation favoring gay marriage increased only by 5%; it being 33% in 2003 and 38% in 2013. It can be concluded from the survey that during the past 10 years, a population of people belonging to various generations have changed their minds and they have shown an increasing support for gay couples.
 

Generalization- From the survey, it can be generalized that over the years, people have started accepting gay couples in the society. It can be due to change in the mindset and also due to an increase in the population of a particular generation like the “Millennials” who are strongly in favor of giving equal rights to gay couples. (Harnoor)
 

Reference-
 

Growing support for gay marriage: changed minds and changing demographics. (2013, March 20). Pew Research Center. Retrieved on September 15, 2015 from http://www.people-press.org/2013/03/20/growing-support-for-gay-marriage-changed-minds-and-changing-demographics/


9. Data Commentary
 

From a survey, a chart shows the percentage of three groups of people: General Public, millennial (Age 18-29 in July 2011) and seniors (Age 65+ in July 2011), who support allowing same-sex marriage, allowing same-sex couples’ adoption, allowing same-sex couples to form civil unions and laws that protect same-sex couples against job discrimination. The chart shows that 47% of the General Public, 62% of the millennials and 31% of the seniors support allowing same-sex marriages; 53% of the General Public, 69% of the millennials and 36% of the seniors support allowing same-sex couples’ adoption; 62% of the General Public, 71% of the millennials and 51% of the seniors support allowing same-sex couples to form civil unions; and 71% of the General Public, 79% of the millennials and 58% of the seniors support laws that protect same-sex couples against job discrimination.
 

I found an interesting relation from this data, which is that the value of the percentage of the general public is almost equal to the average of the support of the millennials and the seniors, for which the error from these four types of questions are 1.0%, 0.94%, 1.6% and 3.5%. These can imply a rule in the future that G ≈ (M + S)/2 when G denotes the supporting percentage of the General Public, M denotes the supporting percentage for the millennials and S denotes the supporting percentage for the seniors. If we have more surveys on these three types of people which follow this rule or have the small amount of error, we can use this to estimate the opinions from one type of these people without having a survey, if we have the other two groups’ opinions. For example, if we want to know how many people in the general public support a law, we can have a survey on the millennials and the seniors which I give 61% and 51% and by the formula, we can estimate that the general public should support this law around 56% ((61 + 51)/2 = 56). (Ariyawat)
 

Jones, R.P., Cox, D., & Cook, E. (2011, August 8). Survey | Generations at Odds: The Millennial Generation and the Future of Gay and Lesbian Rights. publicreligion. Retrieved on September 15, 2015 from
http://publicreligion.org/research/2011/08/generations-at-odds/#.VfiE4BFViko